Book Review – Refresh: Spiritual Nourishment for Parents of Children with Special Needs

51s1knwpjtl-_sx321_bo1204203200_Title: Refresh:  Spiritual Nourishment for Parents of Children with Special Needs
Author: Kimberly M. Drew and Jocelyn Green
Publisher: Kregel Publications
Publishing Year: 2016
Pages: 280
My Rating: 5 out of 5 (1 meaning I hated the book, 5 meaning I loved the book)

In recent years, I have been encouraged to see the church growing in its awareness of problems previously swept under the rug or ignored altogether.  Families with special needs children, I believe, have fit into that category.  Growing up with a severely autistic brother made me painfully aware that many within the church have no idea how to encourage these struggling families.  It has never been that no one cared, it’s just that no one knew how to handle it.  It was awkward.  What do you even say?  How could you really help?  It’s been my joy to see that beginning to change.

Refresh:  Spiritual Nourishment for Parents of Children with Special Needs is a daily devotional that will be a benefit to people you know. I wasn’t sure what to think when I first signed up to review this book.  Sometimes books of this nature can just be corny – filled with happy thoughts twisted away from simplistic understandings of commonly misapplied Scripture.  I am overjoyed to say that is not the case with this book.  The authors use Scripture to encourage the soul, rebuke sin, and point weary parents to the Cross of Jesus – just what a devotional ought to do.  Frequent quotations from authors I trust such Gillian Marchenko and Ellen Stumbo give this book an extra dose of weight and credibility in my mind.

What families with special needs children are going to see as they open this book is much they can identify with.  Page after page will detail stories, events, feelings and admissions that you will shout a hearty “amen” at.  This book is intensely relatable.  At the same time, this book will speak truth to your life, even when you may be tempted to wallow in self-pity.  Yet, they will not leave you down as they encourage you with the Word and the knowledge that others are traveling this road with you.  This book would serve as a good, daily dose of inspiration that will help you through the day.

Yet, this book would also benefit the friends, loved ones and pastors of families with children with special needs.  There’s much that just goes uncommunicated.  That’s by design.  Many parents in this situation find themselves frustrated and even embarrassed.  There’s much they just don’t want to say, but wish you could know.  This book will guide you into a world you never knew existed.  It will give you insight into how to minister and love more effectively.  This book would be well worth the cost just for that alone.

Purchase the book for yourself here.

Disclaimer: This book was provided by the publisher for review. I was under no obligation to offer a favorable review.

Gospel Points – The State of the Church in Light of the Election

statechurch

It is the day after the election and many of us were hoping to see an end to all the bickering and fighting brought about by this campaign season. Yet, even among Christians we still see a people divided. On this edition of Gospel Points I chat with my own pastor Joshua Pegram (Morning Star Church in Rockford) about how God’s people are to be unified even as we may be divided along political party lines. Listen in as we discuss such topics as where to draw the line in regards to political involvement and how the church moves forward in light of last night’s election results.

Listen to the streaming audio on podomatic or download the mp3.

Other listening options:

I-Tunes
Sound Cloud
Stitcher
RSS Feed

img_9563

My Endorsements on the Illinois Ballot

US Senate – Republican Mark Kirk is pro-choice who could be, at best, labeled a moderate.  I cannot endorse him.  He is going to lose any way.  He sealed his fate by mocking the family of his opponent in their debate.  On the other hand, Tammy Duckworth seems to be your average liberal who supports abortion on demand and federal funding for Planned Parenthood.  Nothing there for me to endorse.  That leaves me with Libertarian candidate Kent McMillen.  I have my reservations here, but he is pro-second amendment and will vote to shrink the size of government.  My major reservation is his view on abortion.  When I asked him about this he replied, “I believe in a woman’s right to choose, but I am not in favor of federal funding for abortion. I would not vote to fund organizations such as Planned Parenthood. I would like abortions to be safe, rare and privately funded and if a woman was considering the procedure, it would be my hope that she has a supporting network of family, friends, her doctor and her clergy (if applicable).”  So, while I cannot approve of his pro-choice stance, his view is better than the other candidates.  I will be voting for him, but not endorsing him.

Comptroller  – Leslie Munger seems to be the right way to go in this race.  She vows not to pay legislators until we have a budget.  It’s been way too long, perhaps this might nudge them in the right direction.  She also wants to reign in reckless spending and cut waste.  However, some people I respect suggest the Libertarian candidate Claire Bell would be well qualified for the job.  I think I’ll stick with the major party in this one.

General Assembly

68th District – John Cabello.  He’s a former police officer, pro-life and generally conservative.  He’s the clear choice in this race.  My only hesitation is that he is an early supporter of Donald Trump.

69th District – Joe Sosnowski.  He’s a pro-family conservative whose voice is needed in the midst of Springfield corruption.  He also has connections with Rockford Christian School.

20160816_164928

County Chairman – I am supporting Frank Haney.  Of all the races on my ballot, he’s the clearest choice for me.  Mr. Haney is a conservative who will bring integrity back to the chairmanship.  I’ve had the pleasure of meeting him on several different occasions.  He’s great guy who has strong family values and a faith that grounds him.  I really like him and can’t wait to cast my vote for him on Tuesday.

Coroner – I’ll be voting for Bill Hintz.  He’s had experience in this job and seems like he would be competent.  I like that he’s made himself available on social media, something other local candidates ought to be doing.  He writes, “My commitment to our communities is to continue to practice and promote dignified care to those who have passed on, and provide support to those families and friends who are left behind.  I truly believe that we are the last voice for those who have left us. It is my mission to work very diligently to continue to provide the answers needed to support the healing process for families and friends of loved ones that we have lost.  I truly enjoy my position as Chief Deputy Coroner. I am proud of the work that I have done to serve our communities.  During the past 18 years in the Coroner’s Office, I have embraced the challenges of the investigative piece of my responsibilities.”

Judicial Retention – I will most likely be voting to retain all three judges up for retention.  I’m doing this because I honestly do not know much about any of the judges.  My decision is based solely on this website – http://www.illinoisjudges.net/subhead_retention.htm#circuit17

Constitutional Amendment

“The proposed amendment adds a new section to the Revenue Article of the Illinois Constitution. The proposed amendment provides that no moneys derived from taxes, fees, excises, or license taxes, relating to registration, titles, operation, or use of vehicles or public highways, roads, streets, bridges, mass transit, intercity passenger rail, ports, or airports, or motor fuels, including bond proceeds, shall be expended for other than costs of administering laws related to vehicles and transportation, costs for construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair, and betterment of public highways, roads, streets, bridges, mass transit, intercity passenger rail, ports, airports, or other forms of transportation, and other statutory highway purposes, including the State or local share to match federal aid highway funds. You are asked to decide whether the proposed amendment should become part of the Illinois Constitution.”

I will be voting yes on this amendment.  It makes sense to me and will ensure budgeted money will be used on budgeted items.  It will promote responsible spending in other areas as it takes away the temptation to use these funds as a piggy bank.

 

There are other races on the ballot other than the ones mentioned here, such as county board seats and forest preserve director.  However, I found little to no information on these races.  In the age of the internet, there is no excuse for this.  If you are not willing to at least throw together a free blog or Facebook group, you are not worthy of my support or attention.

My Endorsements on the Wisconsin Ballot

phillipanderson

US Senate – this one is easy, I whole-heartedly support Phillip Anderson of the Libertarian Party.  Wisconsin didn’t like Russ Feingold so they voted him out and voted on Ron Johnson.  Now, Wisconsin voters don’t like Ron Johnson and are considering Russ Feingold – the very man they voted out six years ago.  They say the definition of insanity is…  Instead of the same old choices, Wisconsin has a better option – Phillip Anderson.  Phil is a man of faith who recognizes life in the womb and vows to defend it.   This is something you won’t hear out of Ron Johnson.  He wants to uphold the Constitution return Washington back to its Constitutional role and size. He will vote to keep us out of war and defend our right to liberty against government intervention.  He is definingly the way to go in this race.

Listen to my interview with Phillip Anderson here.

US Congress

422269_10151324378508082_1468331399_n

First District – this is also an easy one, re-elect Paul Ryan.  Since gaining the Speakership, Paul Ryan has brought some sanity back to the Republican Party.  Whoever is elected on Tuesday, Paul Ryan will be needed to oppose the tyranny that is most certain to threaten our Republic.  He is our first line of defense.  If the GOP is ever going to gain back some of its credibility, Speaker Ryan will be the key.  His better path forward is a common-sense strategy that will get our country back on track.  He’s the brightest man out there in Washington and, in my opinion, ought to be in the White House.  And, he’s got a 100% pro-life voting record and speaks passionately about the subject.

petertheronselfie

Second District – Peter Theron is the way to go here.  Peter is a friend and just the type of person you want representing you.  He’s not given to extremes and has the temperament that most of the GOP is lacking these days.  He’s pro-life and pro-business.

State Assembly

[Picture not available because stupid Windows 10 hijacked my computer to run updates]

31st District – Amy Loudenback.  I’ve always liked Amy and she’s more than earned my respect.  She’s a person of principle and is willing to stand up for conservative values.  Yet, she also is a reasonable person willing to hear people out.  She’s pro-life and a champion for school choice.

marks

45th District – Mark Spreitzer is not someone I could endorse in any way as we sharply disagree on just about every important issue.  But, since he is unopposed in this election, there are few good things I could say about the man.  Rep. Spreitzer is a genuinely nice person who I have had several very nice encounters with.  He’s been a great guest in my classroom and is willing to listen to those he disagrees with (even people like me).  On a personal level, I like the guy.

Referendum

Question: Shall the County of Rock, adopt the following resolution?

Resolved, that “We the People” of the County of Rock, Wisconsin, seek to reclaim democracy from the expansion of corporate personhood rights and the corrupting influence of unregulated political contributions and spending. We stand with communities across the country to support passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution stating:

  1. Only human beings are endowed with constitutional rights – not corporations, unions, nonprofits or other artificial entities, and
  2. Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting speech.

I would be voting no on this question.  While in general I like the idea of getting money out of politics I don’t think it would be very practical.  Removing money from politics (by public funding for example) would give an incredible advantage to the incumbent.  I also cannot conceive how money does not constitute speech.  Limiting the amount of money I can give to a candidate is limiting my support for him.

Instead of this, I would much rather make all contributions to political campaigns completely transparent.  Let’s publish the names of all donors along with amount they are contributing.  That way everything Is above board and we know who is pulling the strings and who is beholden to others.  That makes more sense to me than limiting liberty.

 

This and That – 10-22-16

Should Christians Feel Guilty All the Time? – Christians tend to motivate each other by guilt rather than grace. Instead of urging our fellow believers to be who they are in Christ, we command them to do more for Christ (see Rom. 6:5-14). So we see Christlikeness as something we are royally screwing up, when we really should see it as something we already possess but need to grow into. – Kevin DeYoung

20 Hungry Mongrels – We have gotten down to this atrocious choice because we have been following the “lesser of two evils” strategy for more than a generation. But when we see how the road we are on is taking us very bad places, our response ought to be to turn around. If we are under judgment, then the need of the hour is repentance. That means doing something different. Repentance is inconsistent with doing the same thing over again, only this time at the lowest levels ever. – Douglas Wilson

The Winner of the Third Presidential Debate

Clearly, this was the most substantive of the three presidential debate.  Chris Wallace was clearly in control and made for a much better discussion of policy.  The very first question (which Hillary never answered) asked about Supreme Court justices and how constitutional interpretative philosophy.  That was the best first question of any debate I’ve ever seen.  Kudos, Mr. Wallace – you’ve been the best moderator of a presidential debate this season.

Who was the winner?  As a #neverTrump guy, it pains me to say it but I think Trump won.  He did what he had to do, which was sure up his base.  Did he change any minds?  I think he gave conservatives who have been abandoning him a reason to come back.  He was throwing red meat to evangelical voters who have serious doubts about the guy.

Overall, we saw a different Donald Trump last night.  He seemed much more informed and prepared.  The first 20 minutes were almost flawless.  He was even patient, at times.  But, of course, he was still slinging mud and hurling insults like a little child.  But, I will give him credit for much needed and appreciated improvement.

My number one issue has always been abortion.  I appreciated Trump’s stance.  Was he sincere?  I have no idea.  But, he stuck to his guns when it would have been easy to waiver.  He threw the horrors of partial-birth abortion in her face and made her own this disgusting, vile butchering of human lives already born!  Was it the best defense of pro-life values?  No.  But, it was the strongest stance I’ve seen the Donald take.  I’m going to give him credit for that.

For many people, Trump disqualified himself for not vowing to accept the results of the election if he losses.  Now, these charges of a rigged election are simply ridiculous.    The media is behind this, really?  The guy is delusional (thus my #neverTrump stance).  But, why should the guy vow to accept an election result no matter what?  There could be legitimate issues that night (think 2000 election).  My problem is not him refusing to take a vow but the reason he would not.

Ok, here are my live tweets starting from bottom to top (@kevinjthompson):

Hillary is hitting this rigged election question out of the park.  #debatenight

Donald was actually doing well until he puts on the tinfoil hat and starts talking rigged election.  #debatenight

Trump pivots to Hillary’s e-mail and thus no one will push Hillary to answer about her husband’s philandering.They’ve moved on #debatenight

Ok,  the wheels are now coming off for  Trump.  He was incoherent trying to defend himself against groping allegations #debatenight

kevinjthompson ‏@kevinjthompson  9h9 hours ago

If he can’t mention wiki-leaks, she can’t mention Trump’s illegally leaked tax returns. #debatenight

“Because he wants a puppet.” – Hillary’s best line so far, and she’s rattling Donald.  #debatenight

I’m actuality rooting for Trump, this is a different candidate tonight.   #debatenight

Would love to hear Trump take a firm pro-life stance here.  #debatenight

Trump wants justices that will interpret the Constitution by original intent.  He knocked that out of the park.   #debatenight

That is the best first question of any debate I’ve ever watched.  Hillary isn’t answering it.  #debatenight

This may be the only time Chris Wallace appears on MSNBC. #debatenight

So Trump has his own fake news coverage of the debate on Facebook live.  Maybe the only way he’ll get positive coverage. Sounds like rigging