US Senate – this one is easy, I whole-heartedly support Phillip Anderson of the Libertarian Party. Wisconsin didn’t like Russ Feingold so they voted him out and voted on Ron Johnson. Now, Wisconsin voters don’t like Ron Johnson and are considering Russ Feingold – the very man they voted out six years ago. They say the definition of insanity is… Instead of the same old choices, Wisconsin has a better option – Phillip Anderson. Phil is a man of faith who recognizes life in the womb and vows to defend it. This is something you won’t hear out of Ron Johnson. He wants to uphold the Constitution return Washington back to its Constitutional role and size. He will vote to keep us out of war and defend our right to liberty against government intervention. He is definingly the way to go in this race.
Listen to my interview with Phillip Anderson here.
First District – this is also an easy one, re-elect Paul Ryan. Since gaining the Speakership, Paul Ryan has brought some sanity back to the Republican Party. Whoever is elected on Tuesday, Paul Ryan will be needed to oppose the tyranny that is most certain to threaten our Republic. He is our first line of defense. If the GOP is ever going to gain back some of its credibility, Speaker Ryan will be the key. His better path forward is a common-sense strategy that will get our country back on track. He’s the brightest man out there in Washington and, in my opinion, ought to be in the White House. And, he’s got a 100% pro-life voting record and speaks passionately about the subject.
Second District – Peter Theron is the way to go here. Peter is a friend and just the type of person you want representing you. He’s not given to extremes and has the temperament that most of the GOP is lacking these days. He’s pro-life and pro-business.
[Picture not available because stupid Windows 10 hijacked my computer to run updates]
31st District – Amy Loudenback. I’ve always liked Amy and she’s more than earned my respect. She’s a person of principle and is willing to stand up for conservative values. Yet, she also is a reasonable person willing to hear people out. She’s pro-life and a champion for school choice.
45th District – Mark Spreitzer is not someone I could endorse in any way as we sharply disagree on just about every important issue. But, since he is unopposed in this election, there are few good things I could say about the man. Rep. Spreitzer is a genuinely nice person who I have had several very nice encounters with. He’s been a great guest in my classroom and is willing to listen to those he disagrees with (even people like me). On a personal level, I like the guy.
Question: Shall the County of Rock, adopt the following resolution?
Resolved, that “We the People” of the County of Rock, Wisconsin, seek to reclaim democracy from the expansion of corporate personhood rights and the corrupting influence of unregulated political contributions and spending. We stand with communities across the country to support passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution stating:
- Only human beings are endowed with constitutional rights – not corporations, unions, nonprofits or other artificial entities, and
- Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting speech.
I would be voting no on this question. While in general I like the idea of getting money out of politics I don’t think it would be very practical. Removing money from politics (by public funding for example) would give an incredible advantage to the incumbent. I also cannot conceive how money does not constitute speech. Limiting the amount of money I can give to a candidate is limiting my support for him.
Instead of this, I would much rather make all contributions to political campaigns completely transparent. Let’s publish the names of all donors along with amount they are contributing. That way everything Is above board and we know who is pulling the strings and who is beholden to others. That makes more sense to me than limiting liberty.