<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/</link>
	<description>The Personal Blog of Kevin Thompson</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ned Netterville</title>
		<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Netterville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Kevin, Thanks for mentioning my website. The site offers a book-length essay at no cost entitled JESUS OF NAZARETH, ILLEGAL-TAX PROTESTER. Some other points contained therein are these: Jesus persuaded at least two, (Levi and Zaccheaus) and probably more, tax collectors to quit their posts and follow him--at immeasurable cost to Rome in terms of missed tax collections. He equated collecting taxes with prostitution and other forms of sinfulness. He said that the sons of God are exempt from taxes. Some of the principles he advocated for righteous living preclude collecting taxes (viz., turn the other cheek, do unto others..., etc.). He pointedly did not dispute the devil's claim that the glory and authority of all earthly kingdom's is given to whomever the devil pleases (Lk 2) Sincerely, Ned Netterville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, Thanks for mentioning my website. The site offers a book-length essay at no cost entitled JESUS OF NAZARETH, ILLEGAL-TAX PROTESTER. Some other points contained therein are these: Jesus persuaded at least two, (Levi and Zaccheaus) and probably more, tax collectors to quit their posts and follow him&#8211;at immeasurable cost to Rome in terms of missed tax collections. He equated collecting taxes with prostitution and other forms of sinfulness. He said that the sons of God are exempt from taxes. Some of the principles he advocated for righteous living preclude collecting taxes (viz., turn the other cheek, do unto others&#8230;, etc.). He pointedly did not dispute the devil&#8217;s claim that the glory and authority of all earthly kingdom&#8217;s is given to whomever the devil pleases (Lk 2) Sincerely, Ned Netterville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Langston</title>
		<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Langston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Sermon for the day

http://www.jesus-on-taxes.com/user/JesusDecember06.pdf

http://whatistaxed.com/who_would_jesus_tax.htm


What was Jesus charged with?

    They began to accuse him, saying, "We found this man perverting the nation, forbidding paying taxes to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king." - Luke 23:2

Depending on which Bible you read, there were two or three charges against Jesus [there were only two charges if we consider that he was perverting-by-forbidding].

    The trial of Jesus Charge 1: "perverting the nation"
       Pervert: to turn upside down, overturn, overthrow; Source: LawyerIntl.com

    Charge 2: "forbidding paying taxes to Caesar"
       Forbid: to command [someone] not to; Source: OneLook Dictionary

    Charge 3: "saying that he himself is Christ, a king."
       Christ: messiah, the expected king and deliverer. Source: Merriam-Webster
       Christ: the Anointed; Savior of the World; Source: Webster's 1828 Dictionary 

One of the charges indicates Jesus was a tax protester, and if true, he was 'forbidding' others to pay taxes. False charges or not, these were the charges made against Jesus. 'It is written.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sermon for the day</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jesus-on-taxes.com/user/JesusDecember06.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesus-on-taxes.com/user/JesusDecember06.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://whatistaxed.com/who_would_jesus_tax.htm" rel="nofollow">http://whatistaxed.com/who_would_jesus_tax.htm</a></p>
<p>What was Jesus charged with?</p>
<p>    They began to accuse him, saying, &#8220;We found this man perverting the nation, forbidding paying taxes to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.&#8221; - Luke 23:2</p>
<p>Depending on which Bible you read, there were two or three charges against Jesus [there were only two charges if we consider that he was perverting-by-forbidding].</p>
<p>    The trial of Jesus Charge 1: &#8220;perverting the nation&#8221;<br />
       Pervert: to turn upside down, overturn, overthrow; Source: LawyerIntl.com</p>
<p>    Charge 2: &#8220;forbidding paying taxes to Caesar&#8221;<br />
       Forbid: to command [someone] not to; Source: OneLook Dictionary</p>
<p>    Charge 3: &#8220;saying that he himself is Christ, a king.&#8221;<br />
       Christ: messiah, the expected king and deliverer. Source: Merriam-Webster<br />
       Christ: the Anointed; Savior of the World; Source: Webster&#8217;s 1828 Dictionary </p>
<p>One of the charges indicates Jesus was a tax protester, and if true, he was &#8216;forbidding&#8217; others to pay taxes. False charges or not, these were the charges made against Jesus. &#8216;It is written.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.B. Dada</title>
		<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>A.B. Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>One thing Pastor Baldwin missed is the freedom congregations will receive by dismantling the IRS.

Most congregations are limited in speech by the dreadful IRS.  Remove the IRS and pastors will be able to truly lead their flock.

In my opinion, 503/c congregations are hypocrites for submitting to the IRS as an authority of what they can preach an teach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing Pastor Baldwin missed is the freedom congregations will receive by dismantling the IRS.</p>
<p>Most congregations are limited in speech by the dreadful IRS.  Remove the IRS and pastors will be able to truly lead their flock.</p>
<p>In my opinion, 503/c congregations are hypocrites for submitting to the IRS as an authority of what they can preach an teach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul - Presidential Candidate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; delveintothedepths</title>
		<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul - Presidential Candidate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; delveintothedepths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Politcal, Computing, and Clarion News &#124; Global Toad News wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Some have wondered why I have yet to post Dr. Chuck Baldwin’s latest column.  The reason is simple, he and I disagree at the moment.  Baldwin’s latest article asks fellow pastors to consider the candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul.  To be honest, I am not so keen on Dr. Paul as I once was.  I’ll share my thoughts about that a little later [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Politcal, Computing, and Clarion News | Global Toad News wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Some have wondered why I have yet to post Dr. Chuck Baldwin’s latest column.  The reason is simple, he and I disagree at the moment.  Baldwin’s latest article asks fellow pastors to consider the candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul.  To be honest, I am not so keen on Dr. Paul as I once was.  I’ll share my thoughts about that a little later [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul - Presidential Candidate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul - Presidential Candidate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinjthompson.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/ron-paul-and-chuck-baldwin/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] Vote Ron Paul 2008 &#124; Ron Paul for President 2008 Community wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSome have wondered why I have yet to post Dr. Chuck Baldwin&#8217;s latest column.  The reason is simple, he and I disagree at the moment.  Baldwin&#8217;s latest article asks fellow pastors to consider the candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul.  To be honest, I am not so keen on Dr. Paul as I once was.  I&#8217;ll share my thoughts about that a little later.  Tomorrow and I am leaving for a two-day teacher&#8217;s convention, followed by a weekend away in Conneticut.   So the article will have to wait a little bit.  But, let me say this - is there a better presidential candidate than Ron Paul?  Yes.  That man is Chuck Baldwin.  Just for full disclosure, you can read the Baldwin piece here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vote Ron Paul 2008 | Ron Paul for President 2008 Community wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSome have wondered why I have yet to post Dr. Chuck Baldwin&#8217;s latest column.  The reason is simple, he and I disagree at the moment.  Baldwin&#8217;s latest article asks fellow pastors to consider the candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul.  To be honest, I am not so keen on Dr. Paul as I once was.  I&#8217;ll share my thoughts about that a little later.  Tomorrow and I am leaving for a two-day teacher&#8217;s convention, followed by a weekend away in Conneticut.   So the article will have to wait a little bit.  But, let me say this - is there a better presidential candidate than Ron Paul?  Yes.  That man is Chuck Baldwin.  Just for full disclosure, you can read the Baldwin piece here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
